Driving - Other Traffic Offences

redBar.jpg, 8.2kB

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer

Contact Bill Potts 

07 5532 3133


The Law - Speeding-High Speed Disqualifications
Date: 01/09/2009
Driving - Other Traffic Offences - QLD

What the Law states - Speeding-High Speed Disqualifications


Section 129B of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act Queensland states:

(1) This section applies if-

(a) a person is convicted of an offence against a regulation for driving more than 40km/h over the speed limit; and

(b) the court that convicts the person decides..., to disqualify the person from holding or obtaining a driver licence for a period.

(2) The disqualification must be for a period of at least 6 months.

What the Police must prove - Speeding-High Speed Disqualifications


In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt:

The accused:

(1) Was driving; and

(2) Was driving in excess of 40km/h over the speed limit.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum Penalty - Speeding-High Speed Disqualifications


Maximum Licence Disqualification - at discretion of the court.

Which court will hear the matter - Speeding-High Speed Disqualifications


Under section 3(5) of the Criminal Code Act  Queensland this offence is classed a simple offence and therefore may be heard in the Magistrates Court pursuant to section 19 of the Justices Act Queensland.

Possible Defences - Speeding-High Speed Disqualifications


Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

1. The accused was not in fact speeding more than 40km over the speed limit.

2. Duress - example: there was a threat of harm to the accused or another person that the accused reasonably believe would be carried out if he/she did not drive at the speed they did.

3. Necessity - example: there was an extraordinary emergency that compelled the accused to drive at the speed he/she did.

4. Insanity

5. Identification i.e. the accused was not the driver

6. Mistake of fact - example: the accused held an honest and reasonable, but mistaken belief that the speed that he/she was travelling at was under the speed limit set for that zone (i.e. there was in fact a 100km/h sign posted, despite the area actually being designated at a 60km/h zone).

Criminal Law Article written by Bill Potts (Queensland criminal defence lawyer who is experienced in Traffic Offence matters)

latestNewsTraffic.jpg, 15kB

12/08/2010

Stealing from the Salvos

Bill Potts talks to Today Tonight about Stealing by Finding and stealing from the Salvation Army.

Read More
22/07/2010

Boardroom Radio - Justice Mediation Wallabies Star

Charges against Wallabies star dropped after justice mediation completed - Cameron Browne, Director at Potts Lawyers - Wed, 21 July 2010 1:30pm

Read More
19/07/2010

Bail granted for baseball bat assault

Mark Williams represents client in successful bail application regarding alleged altercation with a baseball bat and samurai sword.

Read More