Commonwealth Offences

redBar.jpg, 8.2kB
ADLA member for - QLD

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer


Commonwealth Offences - Federal
If you have been charged with Commonwealth Offences or are enquiring about what the law states you come to the right website!
The Law - Possessing Things Connected With Terrorist Acts
Date: 09/01/2009

What the Law states - Possessing Things Connected With Terrorist Acts

Sections 101.4 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code states:

(1) A person commits an offence if:

(a) The person possesses a thing; and

(b) The thing is connected with preparation for, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in a terrorist act; and

(c) The person mentioned in paragraph (a) knows of the connection described in paragraph (b)

(2) A person commits an offence if:

(a) The person possesses a thing; and

(b) The thing is connected with preparation for, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in a terrorist act; and

(c) The person mentioned in paragraph (a) is reckless as to the existence of the connection described in paragraph (b)

(3) A person commits an offence under subsection (1) or (2) even if:

(a) A terrorist act does not occur; or

(b) The thing is not connected with preparation fro, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in a specific terrorist act; or

(c) The thing is connected with preparation for, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in more than one terrorist act.

(4) Section 15.4 (extended geographical jurisdiction-category D) applies to an offence against this section.

Section 15.4 states

If a law of the Commonwealth provides that this section applies to a particular offence, the offence applies:

(a) whether or not the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs in Australia; and

(b) whether or not a result of the conduct constituting the alleged offence occurs in Australia.

What the Police must prove - Possessing Things Connected With Terrorist Acts

beyond a reasonable doubt.

1. The accused possessed a thing; and

2. The thing is connected with the preparation for, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in a terrorist act; and

3. The person mentioned in paragraph 1. knows of the connection described in paragraph 2.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum Penalty - Possessing Things Connected With Terrorist Acts

The Maximum penalty for the offence of Possessing Things Connected with Terrorist Acts

Section (1) 15 years imprisonment.

Section (2) 10 years imprisonment.

Section (6) states that: if the prosecution for an offence against subsection of this section, the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the offence, but is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence against another subsection of this section, the trier of fact may find the defendant not guilty of the prosecuted offence but guilty of an alternative offence, so long as the defendant has been accorded procedural fairness in relation to the finding of guilt.

Which court will hear the matter - Possessing Things Connected With Terrorist Acts

This matter is Commonwealth Offence which means it is dealt with in the Supreme Court.

Possible Defences - Possessing Things Connected With Terrorist Acts

Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

1. The accused did not possess a thing; and

2. The accused possessed a thing but it was not intended to facilitate preparation for, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in a terrorist act.

3. The accused possessed a thing but did not know it was connected with the preparation for, the engagement of a person in, or assistance in a terrorist act.

null null

Criminal Law Article written by Bill Potts (a Queensland criminal defence lawyer who has knowledge in the Commonwealth Charge of Possessing Things Connected with Terrorist Acts matters)

LMH_Criminal_news.jpg, 15kB

2/02/2012

Mark Williams represents a man sentenced for drug trafficking in the Supreme Court at Brisbane.

In the circumstances, a very good outcome is obtained as a result of the sentence.

Read More
21/01/2012

Mark Williams represents man charged with allegedly importing a border controlled precursor into Australia.

Bail is varied to allow the couple to have contact with each other.

Read More
16/01/2012

Cameron Browne speaks to Channel 9 news on the latest UK phone scams hitting mobile phones.



Read More