redBar.jpg, 8.2kB
ADLA member for - QLD

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer


Other traffic offences - QLD
If you have been charged with Other traffic offences or are enquiring about what the law states you come to the right website!
The Law - Hooning-Undue Smoke And Noise
Date: 01/09/2009

What the Law states - Hooning-Undue Smoke And Noise

Section 291 of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management - Road Rules) Regulation Queensland states:

(1) A person must not-

(a) start a vehicle, or drive a vehicle, in a way that makes unnecessary noise or smoke; or

(b) wilfully start a vehicle, or drive a vehicle, in a way that makes unnecessary noise or smoke.

What the Police must prove - Hooning-Undue Smoke And Noise

In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) The accused started or drove a vehicle; AND

(2) The vehicle made unnecessary noise or smoke in the process of starting or driving the vehicle.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum Penalty - Hooning-Undue Smoke And Noise

Maximum penalty- 20 Penalty units

Note the Police have power to impound or forfeit your vehicle for repeat offence.  For more information please click here.

Penalty unit = $100.00

Which court will hear the matter - Hooning-Undue Smoke And Noise

This matter is an infringement of a regulation rather than an offence and will not be heard in court unless you choose to appeal the matter or you fail to pay the fine, in which case the matter will be heard in the Magistrates Court.

Possible Defences - Hooning-Undue Smoke And Noise

Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

1. The accused did not in fact make unnecessary noise or smoke in the process of starting the vehicle.

2. The accused did not in fact make unnecessary noise or smoke in the process of driving the

3. Duress example: there was a threat of harm against the accused or another person that the accused reasonably believe would be carried out if he/she did do the act/s that constitute the offence.

4. Necessity/Accident - example: there was an extraordinary emergency that compelled the accused to drive in a manner that resulted in unnecessary noise or smoke.

5. Insanity.

6. Identification i.e. the driver was not the accused.

7. Mistake of fact - example: the accused believed that circumstances existed that allowed him/her to drive in a manner that created noise and or smoke (i.e. believed that were involved in a legitimate event that involved drifting, burn outs etc.).

Criminal Law Article written by Bill Potts (Queensland criminal defence lawyer who is experienced in Hooning matters)
latestNewsTraffic.jpg, 15kB

2/02/2012

Mark Williams represents a man sentenced for drug trafficking in the Supreme Court at Brisbane.

In the circumstances, a very good outcome is obtained as a result of the sentence.

Read More
21/01/2012

Mark Williams represents man charged with allegedly importing a border controlled precursor into Australia.

Bail is varied to allow the couple to have contact with each other.

Read More
16/01/2012

Cameron Browne speaks to Channel 9 news on the latest UK phone scams hitting mobile phones.



Read More