redBar.jpg, 8.2kB
ADLA member for - QLD

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer


Commonwealth Offences - Federal
If you have been charged with Commonwealth Offences or are enquiring about what the law states you come to the right website!
The Law - Director Omitting Certain Entries
Date: 09/01/2009

What the Law states - Director Omitting Certain Entries

Section 174 of the Crimes Act states:

Whosoever, being a director, or officer of any body corporate, or public company, receives, or possesses himself or herself, of any of the property of such body corporate, or company, otherwise than in payment of a just debt, and, with intent to defraud, omits to make, or direct to be made, a true and sufficient entry thereof in the books, or accounts, of such body corporate, or company, shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years.

What the Police must prove - Director Omitting Certain Entries

In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.

1. The accused was a director or officer of a company.
2. As such, he or she received or came into possession of the company’s property.
3. He or she omitted to make a true and sufficient entry thereof in the company’s books.
4. With intent to defraud.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum Penalty - Director Omitting Certain Entries

The Maximum penalty for the offence of Directors etc omitting certain entries is ten years imprisonment.

Which court will hear the matter - Director Omitting Certain Entries

This matter is a Table 1 offence which means that either the DPP or an accused can elect to have the matter dealt with in the District Court. If no election is made it will be dealt with in the Local Court.

Possible Defences - Director Omitting Certain Entries

Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to

1. Duress
2. Necessity
3. Intoxication

null null
latestNewsTraffic.jpg, 15kB

2/02/2012

Mark Williams represents a man sentenced for drug trafficking in the Supreme Court at Brisbane.

In the circumstances, a very good outcome is obtained as a result of the sentence.

Read More
21/01/2012

Mark Williams represents man charged with allegedly importing a border controlled precursor into Australia.

Bail is varied to allow the couple to have contact with each other.

Read More
16/01/2012

Cameron Browne speaks to Channel 9 news on the latest UK phone scams hitting mobile phones.



Read More