Crime Commissions & Confiscation
Of Proceeds

redBar.jpg, 8.2kB
ADLA member for - QLD

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer


Crime Commissions & Confiscation of Proceeds - QLD
If you have been charged with Crime Commissions & Confiscation of Proceeds or are enquiring about what the law states you come to the right website!
The Law - Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act-Contravention Of Forfeiture Order
Date: 01/09/2009

What the Law states - Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act-Contravention Of Forfeiture Order

Section 60 of the Criminal Proceeds Confiscations Act Queensland states:

 

(1) A person who conceals property that is the subject of a Forfeiture Order or does another act or makes another omission in relation to property that is the subject of a Forfeiture Order with the intention of directly or indirectly defeating the operation of the Forfeiture Order commits a crime.

What the Police must prove - Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act-Contravention Of Forfeiture Order

In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) That property was forfeited under a Forfeiture Order made under section 58 of the Criminal Proceeds Confiscations Act Queensland (i.e. before conviction); AND

(2) The accused:

(a) Concealed forfeited property; OR

(b) Did an act in respect of forfeited property with the intention of defeating the operation of the Forfeiture Order; OR

(c) Made an omission with the intention of defeating the operation of the Forfeiture Order.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence.

Maximum Penalty - Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act-Contravention Of Forfeiture Order

Maximum Penalty - 350 penalty units or 7 years imprisonment.

Penalty Unit - $100.00.

Which court will hear the matter - Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act-Contravention Of Forfeiture Order

This offence is an indictable offence and will be dealt with in the District Court by virtue of sections 60 and 61 of the District Court of Queensland Act 1967.

Possible Defences - Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act-Contravention Of Forfeiture Order

Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to:

1. The accused had no notice that the property was forfeited and did not have any reason to believe it was forfeited.

2. The accused did not in fact conceal forfeited property.

3. The accused did not do any act with the intention of defeating the operation of the Forfeiture Order.

4. The accused did not make any omission with the intention of defeating the operation of the Forfeiture Order.

5. Duress - example: there was a threat of harm to the accused or another person that the accused reasonably believed would be carried out if he/she did not do the act or omission that constituted the offence.

6. Insanity.

7. Identification i.e. the offender was not the accused.

Criminal Law Article written by Bill Potts (Queensland criminal defence lawyer who is experienced in Confiscation matters)

latestNewsTraffic.jpg, 15kB

2/05/2012

Bill Potts appears for boys charged with the theft of a SeaWorld penguin.

Bill Potts appears in the Southport Magistrates Court for 2 men charged with stealing Dirk the Penguin from SeaWorld.

Read More
26/04/2012

Bill Potts comments to Today Tonight regarding missing mother Allison Baden-Clay.



Read More
23/04/2012

Litigious Tennis players – Kids sue each other on the tennis court

Bill Potts comments to various media channels about civil action in sports involving children.

Read More