Crime Commissions & Confiscation
Of Proceeds

redBar.jpg, 8.2kB

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer

Contact Bill Potts 

07 5532 3133


The Law - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence
Date: 01/09/2009
Crime Commissions & Confiscation of Proceeds - QLD

What the Law states - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence


Section 33 of the Australian Crime Commission Act, Commonwealth states:

(1)  A person shall not, at an examination before an examiner, give evidence that is to his or her knowledge false or misleading in a material particular.

What the Police must prove - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence


In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) You were summonsed to appear at an examination before an examiner; AND

(2) You attended at the examination before an examiner and gave evidence; AND

(3) All or part of that evidence was false or misleading; AND

(4) You were aware at the time that the evidence was false or misleading; AND

(5) The evidence that was false or misleading was in respect of a material particular.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence

Maximum Penalty - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence


Maximum penalty - 200 penalty units or 5 years imprisonment.

Penalty unit = $100.00

Which court will hear the matter - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence


This is an indictable offence. As a general rule, indictable offences of this nature must be heard in the District Court, however it may heard summarily in the Magistrates Court by virtue of section 33(3) of the Australian Crime Commission Act, Commonwealth.

Possible Defences - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence


Possible defences to an offence against either subsection (1), (2) or (3) include but are not limited to:

1. You never in fact gave any evidence before an examiner pursuant to a summons.

2. The content in the evidence was in fact true and presented in a manner that accurately portrayed the true meaning of the information.

3. The content that was false or misleading was not in respect of a material particular.

4. You were unaware that the content was false or misleading, and believed the information was true and presented in a manner that accurately portrayed the true meaning of the information.

5. Duress - example: there was a threat of harm to the accused or another person that the accused reasonably believe would be carried out if he/she did not give false or misleading evidence.

6. Insanity.

7. Identification i.e. the accused was not the discloser.

Criminal Law Article written by Bill Potts (Queensland criminal defence lawyer who is experienced in Australian Crime Commission matters)

latestNewsTraffic.jpg, 15kB

22/07/2010

Boardroom Radio - Justice Mediation Wallabies Star

Charges against Wallabies star dropped after justice mediation completed - Cameron Browne, Director at Potts Lawyers - Wed, 21 July 2010 1:30pm

Read More
19/07/2010

Bail granted for baseball bat assault

Mark Williams represents client in successful bail application regarding alleged altercation with a baseball bat and samurai sword.

Read More
9/07/2010

Mrs Big - Nana Puscas - Romanian Drug Trafficking

Mrs Big – Nana Puscas is represented by Mark Williams in a Romanian Drug Trafficking offence. Bail applications were heard in the Southport Magistrates Court.

Read More