Crime Commissions & Confiscation
Of Proceeds

redBar.jpg, 8.2kB
ADLA member for - QLD

Written by
Bill Potts
Director - Criminal Lawyer


Crime Commissions & Confiscation of Proceeds - QLD
If you have been charged with Crime Commissions & Confiscation of Proceeds or are enquiring about what the law states you come to the right website!
The Law - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence
Date: 01/09/2009

What the Law states - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence

Section 33 of the Australian Crime Commission Act, Commonwealth states:

(1)  A person shall not, at an examination before an examiner, give evidence that is to his or her knowledge false or misleading in a material particular.

What the Police must prove - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence

In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) You were summonsed to appear at an examination before an examiner; AND

(2) You attended at the examination before an examiner and gave evidence; AND

(3) All or part of that evidence was false or misleading; AND

(4) You were aware at the time that the evidence was false or misleading; AND

(5) The evidence that was false or misleading was in respect of a material particular.

It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence. Click here to learn more about identification evidence

Maximum Penalty - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence

Maximum penalty - 200 penalty units or 5 years imprisonment.

Penalty unit = $100.00

Which court will hear the matter - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence

This is an indictable offence. As a general rule, indictable offences of this nature must be heard in the District Court, however it may heard summarily in the Magistrates Court by virtue of section 33(3) of the Australian Crime Commission Act, Commonwealth.

Possible Defences - Australian Crime Commission-Giving False Or Misleading Evidence

Possible defences to an offence against either subsection (1), (2) or (3) include but are not limited to:

1. You never in fact gave any evidence before an examiner pursuant to a summons.

2. The content in the evidence was in fact true and presented in a manner that accurately portrayed the true meaning of the information.

3. The content that was false or misleading was not in respect of a material particular.

4. You were unaware that the content was false or misleading, and believed the information was true and presented in a manner that accurately portrayed the true meaning of the information.

5. Duress - example: there was a threat of harm to the accused or another person that the accused reasonably believe would be carried out if he/she did not give false or misleading evidence.

6. Insanity.

7. Identification i.e. the accused was not the discloser.

Criminal Law Article written by Bill Potts (Queensland criminal defence lawyer who is experienced in Australian Crime Commission matters)

latestNewsTraffic.jpg, 15kB

2/02/2012

Mark Williams represents a man sentenced for drug trafficking in the Supreme Court at Brisbane.

In the circumstances, a very good outcome is obtained as a result of the sentence.

Read More
21/01/2012

Mark Williams represents man charged with allegedly importing a border controlled precursor into Australia.

Bail is varied to allow the couple to have contact with each other.

Read More
16/01/2012

Cameron Browne speaks to Channel 9 news on the latest UK phone scams hitting mobile phones.



Read More